m06-error-handling

Error Handling

Layer 1: Language Mechanics

Core Question

Is this failure expected or a bug?

Before choosing error handling strategy:

Can this fail in normal operation?
Who should handle this failure?
What context does the caller need?

Error → Design Question

Pattern	Don't Just Say	Ask Instead
unwrap panics	"Use ?"	Is None/Err actually possible here?
Type mismatch on ?	"Use anyhow"	Are error types designed correctly?
Lost error context	"Add .context()"	What does the caller need to know?
Too many error variants	"Use Box"	Is error granularity right?

Thinking Prompt

Before handling an error:

What kind of failure is this?
- Expected → Result<T, E>
- Absence normal → Option
- Bug/invariant → panic!
- Unrecoverable → panic!
Who handles this?
- Caller → propagate with ?
- Current function → match/if-let
- User → friendly error message
- Programmer → panic with message
What context is needed?
- Type of error → thiserror variants
- Call chain → anyhow::Context
- Debug info → anyhow or tracing

Trace Up ↑

When error strategy is unclear:

"Should I return Result or Option?"
    ↑ Ask: Is absence/failure normal or exceptional?
    ↑ Check: m09-domain (what does domain say?)
    ↑ Check: domain-* (error handling requirements)

Situation	Trace To	Question
Too many unwraps	m09-domain	Is the data model right?
Error context design	m13-domain-error	What recovery is needed?
Library vs app errors	m11-ecosystem	Who are the consumers?

Trace Down ↓

From design to implementation:

"Expected failure, library code"
    ↓ Use: thiserror for typed errors

"Expected failure, application code"
    ↓ Use: anyhow for ergonomic errors

"Absence is normal (find, get, lookup)"
    ↓ Use: Option<T>

Quick Reference

Pattern	When	Example
`Result<T, E>`	Recoverable error	`fn read() -> Result<String, io::Error>`
`Option<T>`	Absence is normal	`fn find() -> Option<&Item>`
`?`	Propagate error	`let data = file.read()?;`
`unwrap()`	Dev/test only	`config.get("key").unwrap()`
`expect()`	Invariant holds	`env.get("HOME").expect("HOME set")`
`panic!`	Unrecoverable	`panic!("critical failure")`

Library vs Application

Context	Error Crate	Why
Library	`thiserror`	Typed errors for consumers
Application	`anyhow`	Ergonomic error handling
Mixed	Both	thiserror at boundaries, anyhow internally

Decision Flowchart

Common Errors

Error	Cause	Fix
`unwrap()` panic	Unhandled None/Err	Use `?` or match
Type mismatch	Different error types	Use `anyhow` or `From`
Lost context	`?` without context	Add `.context()`
`cannot use ?`	Missing Result return	Return `Result<(), E>`

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern	Why Bad	Better
`.unwrap()` everywhere	Panics in production	`.expect("reason")` or `?`
Ignore errors silently	Bugs hidden	Handle or propagate
`panic!` for expected errors	Bad UX, no recovery	Result
Box everywhere	Lost type info	thiserror

When	See
Domain error strategy	m13-domain-error
Crate boundaries	m11-ecosystem
Type-safe errors	m05-type-driven
Mental models	m14-mental-model

Error Handling

Layer 1: Language Mechanics

Core Question

Is this failure expected or a bug?

Before choosing error handling strategy:

Can this fail in normal operation?
Who should handle this failure?
What context does the caller need?

Error → Design Question

Pattern	Don't Just Say	Ask Instead
unwrap panics	"Use ?"	Is None/Err actually possible here?
Type mismatch on ?	"Use anyhow"	Are error types designed correctly?
Lost error context	"Add .context()"	What does the caller need to know?
Too many error variants	"Use Box"	Is error granularity right?

Thinking Prompt

Before handling an error:

What kind of failure is this?
- Expected → Result<T, E>
- Absence normal → Option
- Bug/invariant → panic!
- Unrecoverable → panic!
Who handles this?
- Caller → propagate with ?
- Current function → match/if-let
- User → friendly error message
- Programmer → panic with message
What context is needed?
- Type of error → thiserror variants
- Call chain → anyhow::Context
- Debug info → anyhow or tracing

Trace Up ↑

When error strategy is unclear:

"Should I return Result or Option?"
    ↑ Ask: Is absence/failure normal or exceptional?
    ↑ Check: m09-domain (what does domain say?)
    ↑ Check: domain-* (error handling requirements)

Situation	Trace To	Question
Too many unwraps	m09-domain	Is the data model right?
Error context design	m13-domain-error	What recovery is needed?
Library vs app errors	m11-ecosystem	Who are the consumers?

Trace Down ↓

From design to implementation:

"Expected failure, library code"
    ↓ Use: thiserror for typed errors

"Expected failure, application code"
    ↓ Use: anyhow for ergonomic errors

"Absence is normal (find, get, lookup)"
    ↓ Use: Option<T>

Quick Reference

Pattern	When	Example
`Result<T, E>`	Recoverable error	`fn read() -> Result<String, io::Error>`
`Option<T>`	Absence is normal	`fn find() -> Option<&Item>`
`?`	Propagate error	`let data = file.read()?;`
`unwrap()`	Dev/test only	`config.get("key").unwrap()`
`expect()`	Invariant holds	`env.get("HOME").expect("HOME set")`
`panic!`	Unrecoverable	`panic!("critical failure")`

Library vs Application

Context	Error Crate	Why
Library	`thiserror`	Typed errors for consumers
Application	`anyhow`	Ergonomic error handling
Mixed	Both	thiserror at boundaries, anyhow internally

Decision Flowchart

Common Errors

Error	Cause	Fix
`unwrap()` panic	Unhandled None/Err	Use `?` or match
Type mismatch	Different error types	Use `anyhow` or `From`
Lost context	`?` without context	Add `.context()`
`cannot use ?`	Missing Result return	Return `Result<(), E>`

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern	Why Bad	Better
`.unwrap()` everywhere	Panics in production	`.expect("reason")` or `?`
Ignore errors silently	Bugs hidden	Handle or propagate
`panic!` for expected errors	Bad UX, no recovery	Result
Box everywhere	Lost type info	thiserror

When	See
Domain error strategy	m13-domain-error
Crate boundaries	m11-ecosystem
Type-safe errors	m05-type-driven
Mental models	m14-mental-model

Documentation

Documentation

Error Handling

Core Question

Error → Design Question

Thinking Prompt

Trace Up ↑

Trace Down ↓

Quick Reference

Library vs Application

Decision Flowchart

Common Errors

Anti-Patterns

Documentation

m06-error-handling

Documentation

Error Handling

Core Question

Error → Design Question

Thinking Prompt

Trace Up ↑

Trace Down ↓

Quick Reference

Library vs Application

Decision Flowchart

Common Errors

Anti-Patterns

m06-error-handling

Documentation

Documentation

Error Handling

Core Question

Error → Design Question

Thinking Prompt

Trace Up ↑

Trace Down ↓

Quick Reference

Library vs Application

Decision Flowchart

Common Errors

Anti-Patterns

Related Skills

Documentation

m06-error-handling

Documentation

Error Handling

Core Question

Error → Design Question

Thinking Prompt

Trace Up ↑

Trace Down ↓

Quick Reference

Library vs Application

Decision Flowchart

Common Errors

Anti-Patterns

Related Skills