bug-triage

Bug Triage

Triage open bug issues on apify/apify-mcp-server. Analyze, draft responses, get approval, post.

Permissions

• Read-only by default: listing issues (gh issue list), viewing details and comments (gh issue view) — do these automatically, no need to ask.
• Write requires approval: commenting (gh issue comment), closing (gh issue close), editing (gh issue edit) — always present the draft and wait for explicit user approval before executing.

Step 0: Parse arguments

$ARGUMENTS controls scope:

Step 1: Fetch issues

Use the arguments parsed in Step 0 to determine what to fetch.

If specific issue numbers were provided, skip the list queries and fetch each issue directly:

gh issue view <number> --repo apify/apify-mcp-server --comments

Otherwise (label mode, --all, or empty), fetch open bug reports. Use the label from Step 0 (default: bug). Bug reports come in two forms — find both:

1. By label: issues with the parsed label
2. By title prefix: issues with [Bug] in the title (the bug report template adds this, but the label isn't always applied)

# By label (use the label from Step 0, default: bug)

Merge both lists and deduplicate by issue number.

For each issue, fetch full details including all comments (comments often contain the real context):

gh issue view <number> --repo apify/apify-mcp-server --comments

Always read comments before drafting a response. Previous team members may have already replied, asked for details, or provided workarounds. Don't duplicate existing responses.

Step 2: Categorize each issue

Assign one of these categories:

Common root causes (from past triage)

These patterns recur. Check for them first:

1. SSE endpoint removed (April 1, 2026): Users on /sse URLs get connection failures. Fix: switch to https://mcp.apify.com (streamable HTTP).

2. "Tools connected but Claude ignores them": MCP server logs show successful handshake and tools/list, but Claude doesn't use the tools in conversation. This is a Claude Desktop/Cowork behavior, not an Apify server bug. Users need to explicitly ask Claude to use Apify tools.

3. "Unable to connect to extension server": Claude Desktop extension install issues. Usually caused by corrupted npx cache, Claude silently downgrading the extension, or Node.js not on the GUI app's PATH. Fix: use the remote server https://mcp.apify.com as a custom connector.

4. npx cache corruption: Stale cache prevents stdio server from starting. Fix: rm -rf ~/.npm/_npx (macOS/Linux) or rmdir /s /q %LOCALAPPDATA%\npm-cache\_npx (Windows).

5. Claude Desktop connector downgrade: Claude Desktop silently downgrades connectors to older versions. Fix: remove and re-add the connector.

Step 3: Draft response

Style rules:

• Developer-to-developer, plain language
• Concise — 3-8 lines typical, no fluff
• Acknowledge the issue and apologize briefly if the user is stuck
• Reference documentation when a fix or troubleshooting guide exists
• If the server works correctly (logs prove it), say so clearly
• If closing, explain why and point to where to go next

Key documentation links:

• Setup guide: https://docs.apify.com/platform/integrations/mcp
• Claude Desktop troubleshooting: https://docs.apify.com/platform/integrations/claude-desktop#troubleshooting
• Configurator: https://mcp.apify.com

Use Apify MCP tools (search-apify-docs, fetch-apify-docs) to find the right doc link if the issue touches a topic not covered above.

The default recommendation for connection issues is the remote server:

Add a custom connector in Claude Desktop with URL https://mcp.apify.com and follow the OAuth flow.

Step 4: Present and get approval

Present each issue to the user with:

1. Issue number + title + link (https://github.com/apify/apify-mcp-server/issues/<number>)
2. Category (from Step 2)
3. Summary — one line on what's going on
4. Proposed response — the draft comment in a blockquote
5. Proposed action — comment only / comment + close / close as duplicate of #X / skip

MANDATORY: Wait for explicit user approval before posting anything. Never post, close, or modify an issue without the user saying yes.

Step 5: Post

After approval:

Then move to the next issue. After the last one, print a summary table: