address-pr-comments

Address PR Review Comments

Read all review comments on a PR, fix the code for each one, reply to each comment, push the changes, post a summary, and re-request review.

Arguments

• $ARGUMENTS: Optional. A PR number. If omitted, detect the PR from the current branch using gh pr view --json number.

Steps

1. Identify the PR

If a PR number was provided, use it. Otherwise, detect it from the current branch:

gh pr view --json number -q '.number'

If no PR is found, tell the user and stop.

2. Fetch all review comments

Fetch inline review comments, general issue comments, and PR review submissions:

# Inline review comments (code-level feedback)
gh

Get the repo owner and name (used as {owner}/{repo} in API paths):

3. Filter to actionable comments

Skip comments that are:

• Your own replies (from previous runs or the PR author)
• Pure acknowledgments ("LGTM", "looks good", "thanks", etc.)
• Already addressed by this automation (check if a previous reply contains "Done in")
• Bot comments (github-actions, dependabot, etc.) — but NOT Copilot (copilot), which posts actionable review feedback that should be addressed
• Inline thread replies where in_reply_to_id is non-null — only treat top-level inline comments (those with in_reply_to_id == null) as separate actionable items

Focus on comments that contain feedback, suggestions, questions, or requested changes.

For PR review submissions, treat reviews with state: CHANGES_REQUESTED or COMMENTED that have a non-empty body as actionable. Skip reviews with state: APPROVED or DISMISSED, and skip reviews from bots (same rules as above).

4. Address each comment (one commit per comment)

Process each actionable comment one at a time. For each comment: fix, commit, push. Do NOT reply to comments during this phase — all replies happen at the end.

1. Read the relevant code: Use the file path and line number from inline comments. If line is null (outdated comment), fall back to original_line and use the diff_hunk to locate the relevant code in the current file. For general comments, identify which files they reference.

2. Understand the ask: Determine what the reviewer wants — a bug fix, style change, refactor, clarification, etc.

3. Make the fix: Edit the code to address the feedback. Follow the project conventions from AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md.

4. Commit and push: Stage only the files changed for this comment, commit, and push immediately. This ensures the commit hash is available on the remote for linking.

   git add <changed-files>
   git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
   Address review: <short description of what was fixed>
    
   Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
   EOF
   )"
   git push

5. Track what you did: Record the comment, the action taken, and the full commit hash (git rev-parse HEAD) for the replies and summary later.

If a comment asks for something that would be incorrect, harmful to the codebase, or contradicts project conventions, don't make the change. Instead, prepare a respectful explanation of why. No commit is created for declined comments.

5. Reply to all comments

After all comments have been addressed and pushed, reply to each one:

If fixed (inline review comment):

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments/{comment_id}/replies \
  --method POST -f body="Done in ${FULL_COMMIT_HASH}"

If fixed (general PR comment):

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments \
  --method POST -f body="@reviewer Re: your comment about X — Done in ${FULL_COMMIT_HASH}"

If not fixed (inline review comment):

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments/{comment_id}/replies \
  --method POST -f body="I considered this but didn't make the change because: [reason]"

If not fixed (general PR comment):

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments \
  --method POST -f body="@reviewer Re: your comment about X — I considered this but didn't make the change because: [reason]"

If fixed (PR review submission):

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments \
  --method POST -f body="@reviewer Re: your review — Done in ${FULL_COMMIT_HASH}"

If not fixed (PR review submission):

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments \
  --method POST -f body="@reviewer Re: your review — I considered this but didn't make the change because: [reason]"

6. Post a summary comment

Post a single summary comment on the PR listing everything you did:

gh pr comment {pr_number} --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Review feedback addressed
 
{For each comment, one bullet point:}
- **File.swift:42** (@reviewer): [what was asked] — Done in <full-sha>
- **File.swift:87** (@reviewer): [what was asked] — Done in <full-sha>
- **General** (@reviewer): [what was asked] — Not changed because [reason]
- **Review** (@reviewer): [what was asked] — Done in <full-sha>
EOF
)"

7. Re-request reviews

Collect the unique usernames of all human commenters (exclude bot accounts like copilot, github-actions, etc.), then re-request their review:

gh pr edit {pr_number} --add-reviewer reviewer1,reviewer2

Note: Bot accounts like Copilot cannot be re-requested for review — they will automatically re-review when new commits are pushed.

8. Output

Print a summary to the user:

• How many comments were addressed
• How many were skipped (with reasons)
• The list of commit hashes
• The PR URL