spec-driven-development

Spec-Driven Development

A comprehensive methodology for systematic software feature development that ensures quality, maintainability, and successful delivery through structured planning.

When to Use This Skill

Ideal scenarios:

• Complex features with multiple components, integrations, or user interactions
• High-stakes projects where rework costs are significant
• Team collaboration requiring shared understanding
• AI-assisted development where clear structure improves output quality
• Knowledge preservation for future maintainers

Less suitable:

• Simple bug fixes with obvious solutions
• Experimental prototypes for rapid iteration
• Time-critical hotfixes requiring immediate action
• Well-established patterns with minimal ambiguity

The Three-Phase Workflow

Phase 1: Requirements Gathering

Purpose: Transform vague feature ideas into clear, testable requirements

Process:

1. Capture user stories expressing value and purpose
2. Define acceptance criteria using EARS format (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax)
3. Identify edge cases and constraints
4. Validate completeness and feasibility

EARS Format Patterns:

WHEN [event] THEN [system] SHALL [response]
IF [precondition] THEN [system] SHALL [response]
WHEN [event] AND [condition] THEN [system] SHALL [response]

Example:

**User Story:** As a new user, I want to create an account, so that I can access personalized features.
 
**Acceptance Criteria:**
1.

Phase 2: Design Documentation

Purpose: Create a comprehensive technical plan for implementation

Process:

1. Research technical approaches and constraints
2. Define system architecture and component interactions
3. Specify data models and interfaces
4. Plan error handling and testing strategies

Design Document Structure:

Decision Documentation:

Phase 3: Task Planning

Purpose: Break design into actionable, sequential implementation steps

Process:

1. Convert design elements into specific coding tasks
2. Sequence tasks to enable incremental progress
3. Define clear objectives and completion criteria
4. Reference requirements for traceability

Task Structure:

Task Sequencing Strategies:

• Foundation-First: Core interfaces before dependent components
• Feature-Slice: End-to-end vertical slices for early validation
• Risk-First: Tackle uncertain areas early
• Hybrid: Combine approaches based on project needs

Quality Checklists

Requirements Checklist

• All user roles identified and addressed
• Normal, edge, and error cases covered
• Requirements are testable and measurable
• No conflicting requirements
• EARS format used consistently

Design Checklist

• All requirements addressed in design
• Component responsibilities well-defined
• Interfaces between components specified
• Error handling covers expected failures
• Security considerations addressed

Tasks Checklist

• All design components have implementation tasks
• Tasks ordered to respect dependencies
• Each task produces testable code
• Requirements references included
• Scope is appropriate (2-4 hours each)

Integration with AI Workflows

For Claude Code / AI Assistants:

1. Start with context: Provide project background, constraints, and goals
2. Work in phases: Complete requirements before design, design before tasks
3. Iterate: Refine outputs through conversation rather than single requests
4. Validate: Ask AI to review outputs against checklists
5. Trace: Maintain links between requirements, design, and tasks

Example prompt for starting a spec:

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

1. Skipping phases: Each phase builds on the previous; shortcuts create problems
2. Vague requirements: "System should be fast" vs specific, measurable criteria
3. Implementation details in requirements: Focus on what, not how
4. Over-engineering design: Solve current requirements, not hypothetical future ones
5. Monolithic tasks: Break down into 2-4 hour increments
6. Missing error cases: Always consider what happens when things go wrong

Next Steps

After completing a spec:

1. Begin implementation following task sequence
2. Track progress by marking tasks complete
3. Update spec if implementation reveals gaps
4. Validate completed work against requirements
5. Document learnings for future specs