OverviewHistoryStatsSecurity
npx skills add ...
Documentation
SKILL.md
npx skills add yaklang/hack-skills --skill symbolic-execution-tools
Symbolic execution and constraint solving playbook. Use when solving CTF reversing challenges, recovering keys, bypassing checks, or automating binary analysis with angr, Z3, or Unicorn Engine.
npx skills add yaklang/hack-skills --skill symbolic-execution-tools
AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert symbolic execution techniques using angr, Z3, and Unicorn Engine. Covers CTF challenge automation, constraint solving patterns, function hooking, SimProcedure replacement, and emulation-based unpacking. Base models often produce broken angr scripts due to incorrect state initialization or missing hooks for libc functions.
Also load ANGR_COOKBOOK.md when you need:
| Scenario | Best Tool | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Pure math / equation system | Z3 | Direct constraint solving, no binary needed |
| Binary with control flow | angr | Explores paths, manages constraints automatically |
| Emulate specific code region | Unicorn | Fast, no symbolic overhead, good for unpacking |
| Complex binary + custom VM | angr + Unicorn (combo) | angr for control flow, Unicorn for VM handlers |
| Kernel / firmware code | Qiling | Full system emulation with OS awareness |
| Use Case | Approach |
|---|---|
| Unpack shellcode | Map shellcode, emulate, dump decoded payload |
| Decrypt strings | Emulate decryption function with controlled inputs |
| Brute-force short keys | Loop emulation with different key inputs |
| Analyze obfuscated function | Emulate function, observe register/memory state |
| Firmware code emulation | Map firmware memory layout, emulate routines |
| Strategy | Implementation |
|---|---|
| Constrain input space | Add constraints (printable, length limits) |
| Avoid dead-end paths | Use avoid= for known failure addresses |
| Hook complex functions | Replace with simplified SimProcedure |
| Limit loop iterations | state.options.add(angr.options.LAZY_SOLVES) |
| Use veritesting | simgr.explore(..., technique=angr.exploration_techniques.Veritesting()) |
| DFS instead of BFS | simgr.use_technique(angr.exploration_techniques.DFS()) |
| Timeout per path | simgr.explore(..., num_find=1) + timeout wrapper |
This dramatically speeds up execution: concrete code runs natively via Unicorn, switching to symbolic only when symbolic variables are involved.
| Problem | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| angr hangs forever | Path explosion in loops | Add avoid= for loop-back edges, or hook the loop |
Z3 returns unknown | Non-linear constraints too complex | Simplify, split into sub-problems, use set_param("timeout", 5000) |
| Unicorn crashes on syscall | Syscall not handled | Hook syscall interrupt, handle or skip |
| angr wrong result | Incorrect state initialization | Verify initial memory layout matches actual binary |
| Symbolic memory too large | Unbounded symbolic reads | Concretize array indices where possible |
| SimProcedure wrong types | Argument type mismatch | Check calling convention (cdecl vs fastcall) |
| angr can't load binary | Missing libraries | Use auto_load_libs=False + hook needed symbols |
# Bitvector (fixed-size integer)
sym_input = claripy.BVS("input", 64) # 64-bit symbolic
sym_byte = claripy.BVS("byte", 8) # 8-bit symbolic
sym_buf = claripy.BVS("buffer", 8 * 32) # 32-byte buffer
# Concrete bitvector
concrete = claripy.BVV(0x41, 8) # concrete value 0x41
# Constraints
state.solver.add(sym_input > 0)
state.solver.add(sym_input < 100)
state.solver.add(sym_byte >= 0x20) # printable ASCII
state.solver.add(sym_byte <= 0x7e)
# Evaluate
value = state.solver.eval(sym_input)
all_values = state.solver.eval_upto(sym_input, 10) # up to 10 solutionsflag_len = 32
sym_stdin = claripy.BVS("stdin", 8 * flag_len)
state = proj.factory.entry_state(stdin=sym_stdin)
# Constrain to printable ASCII
for i in range(flag_len):
byte = sym_stdin.get_byte(i)
state.solver.add(byte >= 0x20)
state.solver.add(byte <= 0x7e)# Hook by address (skip N bytes of original code)
@proj.hook(0x401100, length=5)
def skip_check(state):
state.regs.eax = 1 # force success
# SimProcedure: replace library function
class MyStrcmp(angr.SimProcedure):
def run(self, s1, s2):
return claripy.If(
self.state.memory.load(s1, 32) == self.state.memory.load(s2, 32),
claripy.BVV(0, 32),
claripy.BVV(1, 32)
)
proj.hook_symbol('strcmp', MyStrcmp())
# Hook common problematic functions
proj.hook_symbol('printf', angr.SIM_PROCEDURES['libc']['printf']())
proj.hook_symbol('scanf', angr.SIM_PROCEDURES['libc']['scanf']())
proj.hook_symbol('puts', angr.SIM_PROCEDURES['libc']['puts']())# Read memory (symbolic-aware)
data = state.memory.load(addr, size) # returns BV
data_concrete = state.solver.eval(data, cast_to=bytes)
# Write memory
state.memory.store(addr, claripy.BVV(0x41, 8))
state.memory.store(addr, sym_buf)
# Read/write registers
rax = state.regs.rax
state.regs.rdi = claripy.BVV(0x1000, 64)from z3 import *
# Sorts
x = BitVec('x', 32) # 32-bit bitvector
y = Int('y') # arbitrary precision integer
b = Bool('b') # boolean
# Solver
s = Solver()
s.add(x + y == 42)
s.add(x > 0)
s.add(y > 0)
if s.check() == sat:
m = s.model()
print(f"x = {m[x]}, y = {m[y]}")# Serial key validation: each char satisfies constraints
key = [BitVec(f'k{i}', 8) for i in range(16)]
s = Solver()
for k in key:
s.add(k >= 0x30, k <= 0x7a) # alphanumeric-ish
# XOR key recovery
plaintext = b"known_plaintext"
ciphertext = b"\x12\x34..."
key_byte = BitVec('key', 8)
s = Solver()
for p, c in zip(plaintext, ciphertext):
s.add(p ^ key_byte == c)
# System of linear equations (modular)
a, b, c = BitVecs('a b c', 32)
s = Solver()
s.add(3*a + 5*b + 7*c == 0x12345678)
s.add(2*a + 4*b + 6*c == 0xDEADBEEF)
s.add(a ^ b ^ c == 0xCAFEBABE)from z3 import Optimize
opt = Optimize()
x = BitVec('x', 32)
opt.add(x > 0)
opt.add(x < 1000)
opt.minimize(x) # find smallest satisfying value
opt.check()
print(opt.model())from unicorn import *
from unicorn.x86_const import *
from capstone import Cs, CS_ARCH_X86, CS_MODE_64
mu = Uc(UC_ARCH_X86, UC_MODE_64)
CODE_ADDR = 0x400000
STACK_ADDR = 0x7fff0000
STACK_SIZE = 0x10000
mu.mem_map(CODE_ADDR, 0x10000)
mu.mem_map(STACK_ADDR, STACK_SIZE)
mu.mem_write(CODE_ADDR, code_bytes)
mu.reg_write(UC_X86_REG_RSP, STACK_ADDR + STACK_SIZE - 0x1000)
mu.reg_write(UC_X86_REG_RBP, STACK_ADDR + STACK_SIZE - 0x1000)
mu.emu_start(CODE_ADDR, CODE_ADDR + len(code_bytes))
result = mu.reg_read(UC_X86_REG_RAX)# Hook memory access
def hook_mem(uc, access, address, size, value, user_data):
if access == UC_MEM_WRITE:
print(f"Write {value:#x} to {address:#x}")
elif access == UC_MEM_READ:
print(f"Read from {address:#x}")
mu.hook_add(UC_HOOK_MEM_READ | UC_HOOK_MEM_WRITE, hook_mem)
# Hook specific instruction (for tracing)
def hook_code(uc, address, size, user_data):
code = uc.mem_read(address, size)
md = Cs(CS_ARCH_X86, CS_MODE_64)
for insn in md.disasm(bytes(code), address):
print(f" {insn.address:#x}: {insn.mnemonic} {insn.op_str}")
mu.hook_add(UC_HOOK_CODE, hook_code)simgr.explore(
find=lambda s: b"Correct" in s.posix.dumps(1), # stdout contains "Correct"
avoid=lambda s: b"Wrong" in s.posix.dumps(1) # avoid "Wrong" output
)state = proj.factory.entry_state(
add_options={angr.options.UNICORN} # use Unicorn for concrete regions
)1. Static analysis: identify input method, success/fail conditions
└─ Find "Correct" / "Wrong" strings → get their xref addresses
2. Choose tool:
├─ Pure math (no binary needed) → Z3
├─ Small binary, clear success/fail → angr explore
└─ Specific function to emulate → Unicorn
3. Set up symbolic input:
├─ stdin → claripy.BVS + entry_state(stdin=)
├─ argv → full_init_state(args=[...])
├─ file input → SimFile
└─ specific memory → state.memory.store(addr, sym)
4. Hook problematic functions:
├─ printf/puts → SimProcedure or no-op
├─ scanf → custom handler
├─ time/random → return concrete value
└─ anti-debug → skip entirely
5. Explore and extract:
└─ simgr.explore(find=, avoid=) → solver.eval()Need to solve a reversing challenge?
│
├─ Is the challenge pure math / equations?
│ └─ Yes → Z3
│ ├─ Linear equations → BitVec + Solver
│ ├─ Modular arithmetic → BitVec (natural mod 2^n)
│ ├─ Boolean logic → Bool + Solver
│ └─ Optimization → Optimize + minimize/maximize
│
├─ Is it a compiled binary with clear success/fail?
│ └─ Yes → angr
│ ├─ Input via stdin → symbolic stdin
│ ├─ Input via argv → full_init_state with symbolic args
│ ├─ Input via file → SimFile
│ ├─ Path explosion → add constraints, avoid paths, hook loops
│ └─ Complex library calls → hook with SimProcedure
│
├─ Need to emulate a specific function/region?
│ └─ Yes → Unicorn Engine
│ ├─ Decryption routine → map code + data, emulate, read result
│ ├─ Shellcode analysis → map shellcode, hook syscalls
│ └─ Key schedule → emulate with different inputs
│
├─ Need to analyze firmware / exotic arch?
│ └─ Yes → Qiling (full system emulation with OS support)
│
├─ Binary has VM protection?
│ └─ angr for handler analysis + Z3 for bytecode constraints
│
└─ None of the above working?
├─ Combine: Unicorn for concrete regions + Z3 for constraints
├─ Manual reverse engineering with debugger
└─ Side-channel approach (timing, power analysis for hardware)# angr (Python 3.8+)
pip install angr
# Z3
pip install z3-solver
# Unicorn Engine
pip install unicorn
# Capstone (disassembly, pairs with Unicorn)
pip install capstone
# Keystone (assembly)
pip install keystone-engine